Joe Lin
Joe Lin earned a bachelor’s degree from Tamkang University in Taiwan and a master’s degree in civil engineering from the National Taiwan University. He is a founding partner of YEN Partnership Architects and chairman of the board of the Chinese Society of Interior Designers (CSID).
Joe is currently a lecturer in the Department of Architecture at CYCU.
Outside of his professional activities, he serves as a visiting critic at universities, where he hosts lectures and debates and shares his academic research on new possibilities in architecture and urban space. Joe Lin also plays an active role in the cultural and creative industries.
Under his guidance, Joe’s team has won numerous major awards, including the TID (Taiwan International Design Awards), the HKDA (Hong Kong Designers Association Award), the Golden Pin Design Award, the Taiwan Architecture Award, the Red Dot Design Award, the iF Design Award, the [d]arc awards and the A’ Design Award and Competition.
Red Dot in an interview with Joe Lin
In what areas are you seeing the biggest evolution in interior design?
Interior design is evolving beyond pure aesthetics. It’s becoming a discipline rooted in human behaviour, sustainability and social connections. At the same time, the use of technology, especially AI and smart systems, is changing our understanding of flexibility and personalised spatial experiences.
Are these changes global in nature, or would you say architecture and interior design are more country-specific?
Some trends, such as sustainability and well-being, are global because they respond to shared challenges. However, the ways in which they are interpreted always carry a local flavour that is shaped by climate, culture and social frameworks. In my opinion, good design is both universal and deeply contextual.
Can you see the potential of an interior space at first glance, or do you need to take a slower approach?
There are times when the potential of a space is immediately evident – in its light, its proportions or its atmosphere. But I often prefer to approach it at a slower pace. A space only reveals itself completely if you engage with it through time, movement and even silence.
Is there a building that has made a deep impression on you?
The Church of the Light by Tadao Ando has always stayed with me. It’s a space with powerful silence, where architecture takes on a spiritual dimension through light and shadows. This reminds me that restraint and clarity are often more engaging than complexity.
What is your take on interior design in public spaces? Is it well planned, or is there something that is often overlooked?
Public spaces tend to focus on form or efficiency while neglecting emotional connection and inclusivity. A well-designed public space should be universally welcoming, allow spontaneous interaction and reinforce the users’ and visitors’ sense of belonging.
Is there an era or a movement that you think deserves a renaissance?
The arts and crafts movement! Not because of its designs, but because of its spirit. I think the emphasis on craftsmanship, integrity and the bond between the maker and the material is particularly relevant in today’s digital world.
You share your expertise with the next generation. Are there any fundamental values that you always pass on to your students?
Empathy, responsibility and curiosity. I always remind my students that there is more to design than simply creating something beautiful. Design should improve lives, challenge norms and embrace social accountability.
This year was your first time as a Red Dot Award: Product Design jury member. How would you rate the overall quality of the entries?
I was impressed by the diversity and depth of the entries. Many projects demonstrated both excellent creative execution and a sincere response to social and environmental issues. It’s encouraging to see designs that dare to question, take a stand and showcase new approaches.
Are judging processes for design and architecture competitions an opportunity for designers to evolve?
Definitely. If the competitions are thoughtfully curated with juries that are diverse and constructive, they become valuable feedback mechanisms. For many designers, the process isn’t only about winning. It’s about reflection, dialogue and refinement.
